Dealing smoothly with student activism: reflections of activists and administrators in Sri Lankan state university system

Authors

  • M.S. Dimuthu Kumari Lecturer, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka
  • R.L.S. Fernando Senior Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka

Keywords:

Student Activism, Activists, Administrators, Strategies, State Universities

Abstract

Activism is natural in any context. Similarly, in Sri Lanka student activism has been a prolonged issue in the state university system. As many sources mentioned, it has been deeply embedded in the system, thus eradicating activism is impossible. Therefore, we need to find some strategies to break the early development of activism and to weaken the impact. However, the local authorities have simply labeled student activism as a political matter and ignored them for years in Sri Lanka. Past studies have extensively discussed the negative consequences of activism, yet the prevention strategies are rarely spoken. Therefore, this study aims to seek strategies to deal with activism smoothly. Since the art of handling conflicts is subjective, this study employed the phenomenological approach under the qualitative strategy. A sample of administrators and student activists was selected using purposive and snowballing sampling techniques. In-depth interviews were conducted to collect data and they were analyzed thematically. Mediation strategies were revealed from both activists' and administrators’ perspectives. Accordingly, this study revealed that activists expect a fair, respectful, friendly, humanistic, and genuine approach from the administrators' end. Administrators seek more autonomy and democratic governance when dealing with activism and they revealed some unique issues of their side. Two-Way communication, flexibility in mechanisms, humanistic approaches, more participation are the concerns where both parties are well thought out. All the identified strategies will be useful in handling activism smoothly in the future.

References

White, L. (2003). Protests, Activism, and Student Riots. Annual Conference on Legal Issues in Higher Education. The University of Vermont, October 5-7, 2003.

Samaranayake, G. (2015). Changing University Student Politics in Sri Lanka: From Norm Oriented to Value Orient Student Movement, Social Affairs: A Journal for the Social Sciences, 1 (3), 23-32. Retrieved from, http://www.worlduniversityfriends.org/Achive/Fall_2015/3_SAJ_1(3)Samaranayaka.pdf

University Grant Commission. (2012). University Student Charter. Sri Lanka

Kumari, M.S.D., & Fernando, R.L.S. (2020). Determinants of student activism and implications for state university administration in Sri Lanka. Manuscript submitted for publication

Burgess, P.M., & Hofstetter, C.R. (1971). The Student Movement: Ideology and Reality. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 687–702. Midwest Political Science Association.

Janc, J. (2004). The meaning of the student advisory board leadership development experience to the student board members, Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Maryland

Weeramunda, A.J. (2008). Socio political impact of student violence and indiscipline in universities and tertiary education institute, National Education Commission, Sri Lanka. Retrieved from, http://nec.gov.lk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Socio_Political_impact_on_the_students_and_staff.pdf

President's Commission on Campus Unrest. (1970). The Report of the President's Commission on-Campus Unrest. Washington, D.C., US. Accessed online; https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED083899.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1OYAUxWVXtSsUbSHlCO67UY0VLqfMz9VgUXpfwLm12RhWVNEUhD-ThbLM

Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. New York, NY:Verso

Harrison, Laura and Mather (2017). Making Meaning of Student Activism: Student Activist and Administrator Perspectives. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 29 (2), 117-135.

Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Barnett, K. (2005). Student Activists' Characterizations of Administrators in Higher Education: Perceptions of Power in "the System". Review of Higher Education: Journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, 28(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0012

Garwe, E.C. (2017). Student Voice: Embracing Student Activism as a Quality Improvement Tool in Higher Education. In Renes S. (Eds.), Global Voices in Higher Education, Intech Open. http://DOI:10.5772/intechopen.68669

Jacoby, B. (2017). The New Student Activism: Supporting Students as Agents of Social Change. Journal of College and Character, 18 (1), 1-8. http://DOI: 10.1080/2194587X.2016.1260479

Cormick, J.M. (N.D). Suggestions for Management of Student Activism. Effectively Channeling Student Activism, Department of Education, Indiana

Stone & Starkey (2011). The possible impact of university corruption on customers’ ethical standards. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 18 (3), 154–170. Online Available : file:///C:/Users/FMSC/Desktop/Stone-Starkey2011_Article_ThePossibleImpactOfUniversityC.pdf

Goh, P.S.C., & AbdulWahab, N. (2020). Paradigms to Drive Higher Education 4.0. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19 (1), 159-171. Online Available: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.1.9

Fako & Molamu (1995). Reflections on managing student protest. South African Journal of Sociology, 26 (4), 109-115. DOI: 10.1080/02580144.1995.10432115

Published

2021-06-25
Statistics
Abstract Display: 231
PDF Downloads: 184

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

M.S. Dimuthu Kumari, & R.L.S. Fernando. (2021). Dealing smoothly with student activism: reflections of activists and administrators in Sri Lankan state university system. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(3), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/141