Exploring filial piety as an inspirational moral value from Mahabharata

Tamil Arasi  Muniandy; Rajantheran  Muniandy

doi:10.33306/mjssh/207

Tamil Arasi Muniandy Department of Indian Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Rajantheran Muniandy Department of Indian Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, Malaysia

Abstract

The Mahabharata (Mbh) is a well-known ancient epic that is seven times longer than the Iliad and Odyssey combined. It has been a key source of moral ideas and education for Indians. The story centred around the Kauravas and Pandavas, two branches of the same family. Through the family story, the author draws all aspects of human existence, namely Dharma (Virtue and Social Righteousness), Artha (Acquisition of Wealth), Kama (Enjoyment and Sensual Pleasure) and Moksha (Spiritual Liberation). This study seeks to identify moral values associated with family life, especially love for parents. Though many scholars studied this epic, love between children and parents is underexplored. This epic is also often misconstrued as a spiritual text, which limits its application to moral living. Textual analysis, is employed for data extraction and interpreted through Hermeneutic Approach. Four steps were used for analysis, namely, Identifying and Documenting, Investigation and Categorisation, Interpretation and Analysis, and finally Integration and Conclusion. Murray Bowen's Family Systems Theory is used to determine how human interaction in a family operates in Mbh and Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory has been chosen as it outlines an individual's moral development in stages.The findings reveal that the children such as Pandavas demonstrated unconditional and selfless love to their parents. They believed that their parents were Gods and should be worshipped.The findings also suggest that the Mbh epic could be an insightful resource in moral teaching and learning and, more importantly, as a guide in building a strong relationship between parents and children.

Keywords: Mahabharata, Moral Values, Familial Value, Filial Piety, Love

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karpaha, N., Selva Balaji, A., & Nagarathinam. D, (2020). Drishti from Mahabharata. Language in India, 20, 59–66. Retrieved from www.languageinindia.

Moraru, C., & Nicole Simek, B. W. (2020). Francophone literature as world literature. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Nath, R. R. (2020). Ethical Dilemma of Karna in “The Mahabharata”, A Critical Study of Karna’s Character in the Light of Episode “The Temptation of Karna.” International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 10–3, 1–6. doi:10.24247/ijesrjun20201.

Hooper, C. (2018). The Mahabharata. A Quarterly Journal of Jungian Thought, 61(1), 76–91. doi:10.1080/00332925.2018.1422931.

Jairam, R. (2017). Importance of Mahabharata – A brief overview. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 7, 669–674. Retrieved from https://www.onlinejournal.in/IJIRV3I7/111.pdf.

Mohanty, P. K. (2005). The Mahabharata: A reading in political structuring. Indian Literature. Sahitya Akademi, 49(1), 146–151. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23346584.

Trikha, U. R. (1980). The concepts of religion in the Mahābhārata. Delhi: Nag Publishers NP-series.

Choudhuri, S., & Basu, J. (2019). Traditional stories as possible vignettes in the research of moral judgement: A preliminary report using stories from Mahabharata. Psychology and Developing Societies, 31(1), 187–219.

Ghosh, B. (2016). Women of Mahabharata in play of power and politics: Sublimation fromdeprivation to empowerment. Journal of Innovative Research and Solutions (JIRAS), 2(2), 25–33. Retrieved from http://www.jirasindia.com/Publication/Vol-1-Iss-8/JDH-004-2016-FP.pdf

Ashokkumar, S. (2014). Thoughts on business ethics and corporate social responsibility from vedic literature. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 15–22. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00171-3.

Gamache, G. (2018): A transcultural comic series caught between nationalism and globalisation, Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 10(3), 293-305. doi:10.1080/21504857.2018.1485719

Khazaie, R. G. (2016). Family values in global perspective. Encyclopedia of Family Studies, 1–5. doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs401.

Nock. S. L. (1992). Sociology of the family (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Almond, B. (2010). Education for tolerance: Cultural difference and family values. Journal of Moral Education, 39(2), 131–143. doi:10.1080/0305724100375484.

Evans, R. (2012). Sibling caringscapes: Time-space practices of caring within youth-headed households in Tanzania and Uganda. Geoforum, 43, 824–835.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hall, S. M. (2016). Moral geographies of family: Articulating, forming and transmitting moralities in everyday life. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(8), 1017-1039. doi:10.1080/14649365.2016.1147063.

Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.

Halstead, J. M. (2010). Moral education in family life: The effects of diversity. Journal of Moral Education, 28(3), 37–41. doi:10.1080/030572499103070.

Noller, P. (1996). What is this thing called love?. Defining the love that supports marriage and family. Personal Relationships, 3(1), 97-115. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00106.x

Schneider, D. M. (1980). American kinship: A cultural account. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dharma, K. (2016). Mahabharata. U.S: Torchlight Publishing.

Keller, M. N., & Noone, R. J. (2019). Handbook of bowen family systems theory and research methods: A systems model for family research. In Handbook of Bowen Family Systems Theory and Research Methods: A Systems Model for Family Research (pp. 1–440). Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9781351103282.

Bahr. H., & Bahr, K. S. (2001). Families and self-sacrifice: Alternative models and meanings for family theory. Oxford Journal, 79(4), 1231–1258. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-pdf/79/4/1231/6885732/79-4-1231.pdf.

Brown, I., & Brown, R. I. (2009). Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practices in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(10-17).

Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16(2), 53-59. doi:10.1080/00405847709542675.

Venkatasamy Nattar, N. M. (2018). Kondrai Vendhan. India: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.

Irvine, D. (2005). The origins of Wayang Purwa. In Leather Gods and Wooden Heroes Java’s Classical Wayang (pp. 14-27). Singapore: Times Edition - Marchall Cavendish.

Subramuniyaswami, S. S. (2004). Living with Shiva: Hinduism's contemporary culture (2nd ed.). USA: Himalayan Academic.

Packard, K. G. (1993). Coping in an interfaith family. New York. The Rosen Publishing Group. Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy (pp. 42-90). New York: Gardner.

Chew, S. H., Kamarulzaman, W., & Lee, T. H. (2018). Elderly people in old age homes: Engaging factors leading to institutionalization. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 28-41. Retrieved from https://myjurnal.mohe.gov.my/public/article-download.php?id=149297.

Armugam, T. C., & Vellymalay, S. K. N. (2017). Dorongan penempatan dan keselesaan diri warga tua di Rumah Seri Kenangan (RSK), Taiping, Perak. E-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 14(1), 90–109.