Amalan kepimpinan autentik guru besar dan pengaruhnya terhadap motivasi kerja dan komitmen guru-guru sekolah rendah negeri Pulau Pinang
AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP PRACTICES OF HEADMASTERS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON WORK MOTIVATION AND COMMITMENT OF PENANG STATE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
Keywords:
Authentic leadership practices, work motivation, commitment of primary school teachers, Amalan kepimpinan autentik, motivasi kerja, komitmen guru-guru sekolah rendahAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the authentic leadership practices of headmasters and its influence on the work motivation and commitment of primary school teachers in Penang. Data were collected through a survey of 69 respondents consisting of headmasters representing the state of Penang. Data of 69 respondents were analyzed using multiple correlation and regression analysis. Based on the results of correlation analysis showed that all dimensions of headmaster leadership style have a significant relationship at p<.01 moderate level with organizational commitment while multiple regression analysis found that the main predictor of headmaster transformational leadership style is individual consideration dimension contributed 11.4% to organizational commitment in the regression model 1. The findings of the study show that the authentic leadership practices of headmasters have a relationship and influence on the commitment of primary school teachers in Penang
[Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk meneliti amalan kepimpinan autentik guru besar dan pengaruhnya terhadap motivasi kerja dan komitmen guru-guru sekolah rendah negeri Pulau Pinang. Data dikumpul melalui tinjauan terhadap 50 reponden yang terdiri daripada guru besar mewakili negeri Pulau Pinang. Data 50 responden telah dianalisis menggunakan analisis korelasi dan regresi pelbagai. Berdasarkan keputusan analisis korelasi menunjukkan bahawa kesemua dimensi gaya kepemimpinan guru besar mempunyai hubungan signifikan pada aras p<.01 yang sederhana dengan komitmen organisasi manakala analisis regresi pelbagai mendapati bahawa peramal utama bagi gaya kepemimpinan transformasi guru besar ialah dimensi pertimbangan secara individu memberi sumbangan sebanyak 11.4% kepada komitmen organisasi dalam model regresi 1. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa amalan kepimpinan autentik guru besar mempunyai hubungan dan pengaruh terhadap komitmen guru-guru sekolah rendah negeri Pulau Pinang.]
References
Elkington, R., van der Steege, M., Glick-Smith, J. and Moss Breen, J. (2017), Visionary Leadership in a Turbulent World: Thriving in the New VUCA Context, Emerald Publications, Bingley.
Kornelsen, J. (2019). The Quest to Lead (with) Millennials in a VUCA-World: Bridging the Gap Between Generations (pp. 27-41). Springer International Publishing.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
Ahmed F., Naqshbandi, M. M., Kaur, S., & Ng, B. K. (2018). Roles of leadership styles and relationship-based employee governance in open service innovation: Evidence from Malaysian service sector. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 353–374.
Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Authentic leadership for teacher’s academic optimism: Moderating effect of training comprehensiveness. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(4), 321-344.
Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2019). Authentic Leadership and Extra Role Behavior: a School Based Integrated Model. Current Psychology, 38(3), 684-697.
Key, R. A. (2017). Investigating The Links Between Feedback Orientation and Leadership Self-Efficacy In Field Grade Officers (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1712/.
Alyahyan, E., & Dü, D. (2020). Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17 (3), 1-21. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7.
Yusof, N. M., & Yusof, R. (2019). Keberkesanan program kelayakan profesional pemimpin pendidikan kebangsaan (NPQEL)- Kertas konsep. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 32 (1), 97-105.
Zainol, M. S., Mohd Hamzah, M. I., & Alias, B. S. (2020). Pengaruh amalan kepimpinan autentik pengetua dan penggunaan media sosial terhadap pemindahan latihan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2020, 1(1), 364-378.
Qureshi, M. A., & Hassan, M. (2019). Authentic leadership, ethical climate & workplace incivility: How authentic leadership prevents deviant work behavior a case from Pakistan. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 144-164.
Ratanasiripong, P., China, T., Ratanasiripong, N. T., & Toyama, S. (2020). Resiliency and mental health of school teachers in Okinawa. Journal of Health Research, 1(1), 1-12. doi:10.1108/jhr-11-2019-0248.
Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2020). Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(6), 734-754. doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1580772.
Singh, G. (2020). Restructuring the national professional qualification for educational leaders (NPQEL) in Malaysia: A summary report. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 3(2), 4–21. doi:10.22452/iojel.vol3no2.2.
Abdul Mosamad, I., & Mansor, A. N. (2019). Kepimpinan autentik dan hubungannya dengan prestasi kerja pensyarah kolej matrikulasi KPM zon timur. In V. Vasudevan, N. F. El-Emin Muhardi, & N. S. R. Zamzam Amin (Eds.) Jurnal Penyelidik Pendidikan (pp. 258-273). Putrajaya: Bahagian BPPDP, KPM.
Michie, S., & Gooty, J. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 441-457.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. Positive Organizational Scholarship, 1(1), 241-261.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
Johnson, S. L. (2019). Authentic Leadership Theory and Practical Applications in Nuclear Medicine. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 47(3), 181-188.
Guenter, H., Schreurs, B., van Emmerik, I. H., & Sun, S. (2017). What Does it Take to Break the Silence in Teams: Authentic Leadership and/or Proactive Followership? Applied Psychology, 66(1), 49-77.
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Saffardin, S. F., & Mydin, A. A. (2019). Pengaruh kepimpinan autentik di tadika swasta Pulau Pinang. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(3), 17-31.
Zafer, A. & Eda, K. (2019). Examination of the effects of emotional intelligence and authentic leadership on the employees in the organizations. Internasional Journal of Organizational Leadership, 8(1), 13-30.
Lee, H. F., Chiang, H. Y., & Kuo, H. T. (2019). Relationship between authentic leadership and nurses’ intent to leave: The mediating role of work environment and burnout. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(1), 52-65. doi:10.1111/jonm.12648.
Cezmi Savas, A., & Toprak, M. (2014). Mediation effect of schools’ psychological climate on the relationship between principals’ leadership style and organizational commitment. Anthropologist, 17(1), 173-182.
Published
Abstract Display: 309 
PDF Downloads: 314 
This work is licensed under a