Development of moral motivation through acting activities in teaching and learning of Moral Education in secondary schools [Perkembangan motivasi moral murid melalui aktiviti lakonan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral di sekolah menengah]
Keywords:
Motivasi moral, Aktiviti lakonan, Pengajaran dan pembelajaran, Pendidikan MoralAbstract
Motivasi moral merupakan unsur yang menjadi penggerak kepada sesuatu tindakan moral. Seseorang yang mempunyai motivasi moral yang tinggi dapat (i) bertanggungjawab terhadap keputusan dan tindakan yang diambil, (ii) komited terhadap prinsip-prinsip moral, (iii) mengutamakan nilai-nilai moral berbanding kehendak lain, (iv) menolak elemen yang memberikan keuntungan peribadi dan (v) berpendirian untuk bertindak berdasarkan unsur moral dan etika. Justeru, artikel ini membincangkan potensi aktiviti lakonan filem pendek sebagai kaedah pengajaran dalam meningkatkan motivasi moral dalam kalangan murid sekolah. Seramai 18 orang murid perempuan dan lelaki (tiga kumpulan berfokus) dari kelas Pendidikan Moral tingkatan empat digunakan untuk tujuan pengumpulan data Teknik pensampelan bertujuan digunakan untuk memilih peserta kajian. Kajian kualitatif ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan instrumen protokol pemerhatian, protokol temu bual dan panduan penulisan jurnal bertujuan untuk mengumpul data. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan aktiviti lakonan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral mampu meningkatkan motivasi moral dalam kalangan peserta kajian.
(Moral motivation is an element that drives towards the moral act. A person with high moral motivation can (i) be responsible for the decisions and actions are taken, (ii) committed to moral principles, (iii) prioritise moral values, (iv) reject elements that provide personal gain and (v) to act on the basis of moral and ethical elements. Hence, this article discusses the potential of short films acting as a method of teaching in improving moral motivation among school children. A total of 18 males and females of Form Four students (three focus groups) were used as samples for data collection purposes. Purposive sampling technique was used to select the study participants. This qualitative study was carried out using observation protocol instruments, interview protocols and journal writing guides aimed at collecting data. Data analysis shows that acting activities in the teaching and learning of Moral Education were able to unleash moral motivation among the participants.)
References
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2000). Moral Subject KBSM Syllabus – Correction (Sukatan Pelajaran Pendidikan Moral KBSM - Semakan). Purtajaya: Curriculum Development Division.
Liau, A. K., Liau, A. W. L., Teoh, G. B. S., & Liau, M. T. L. (2003). The case for emotional literacy: The influence of emotional intelligence on problem behaviours in Malaysian secondary school students. Journal of Moral Education, 32(1), 51-66.
Vishalache Balakrishnan. (2009). Teaching moral education in secondary schools using real-life dilemmas. i-manager’s Journal on Education Psychology, 2(3), 14-20.
Abdul Shatar Che Abdul Rahman. (2009). Content and Pedagogy Knowledge of Form Four Moral Language Teacher in School (Pengetahuan kandungan dan pedagogi guru Pendidikan Moral tingkatan empat di sebuah sekolah). (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Zainul Arifin Md. Isa. (2012, June 13). Grads without soft skills victims of system. New Straits Times, p. 19.
Rest, J. (1984). The major components of morality. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral development and moral behaviour (pp. 24-38). New York: Wiley.
Craig, P. J., & Oja, S. N. (2013). Moral judgement changes among undergraduates in a capstone internship experience. Journal of Moral Education, 42(1), 43-70.
Rushton, C. H., & Penticuff, J. H. (2007). In critical care dilemmas in critical care nursing. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 18(3), 323–328.
Piaget, J. (1962). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McCaslin, M. (2006). Student motivational dynamics in the era of school reform. Elementary School Journal, 106, 479-490.
Bolton, G. (1979). Towards a theory of drama in education. London: Longman.
Ustundag, T. (1997). The advantages of using drama as a method of education in elementary schools. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 13, 89-94.
Balakrishnan, V. (2007). Effect of using Real Life Dilemma in Teaching Learning of Moral Subject (Kesan Menggunakan Dilema Kehidupan Sebenar Dalam Pengajaran-pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral). Education Problem, 30(1), 101–112.
Colby, R. (1982). Drama as a moral imperative. 2D Dance and Drama, 2(1), 11–26.
Colby, R. (1987). Moral education through drama, 2D Dance and Drama, 7(1), 72–80.
Winston, J. (1994) Revising the fairy tale through magic: Antonia Barber’s ‘The enchanter’s daughter’, Children’s Literature in Education, 25(2), 101–111.
Winston, J. (1995). ‘Careful the tale you tell’: Fairy tales, drama and moral education. Children and Society, 9(4), 8–93.
Winston, J. (1996). Emotion,reason and moral engagement in drama. Research in Drama Education, 1(2),189–200.
Edmiston, B. (1994). More than talk: A Bakhtinian perspective on drama in education and change in understanding. NADIE Journal, 18, 25–36.
Edmiston, B. (1995). Discovering right actions: Forging ethical understandings through dialogic interactions. Brisbane: NADIE Publications.
Edmiston, B. (1998a). Ethical imagination: Choosing an ethical self in drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Edmiston, B. (1998c). Reaching out: ethical spaces and drama. Birmingham: National Association for the Teaching of Drama.
Edmiston, B. (2000). Drama as ethical education: Research in drama education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 5(1), 63–84.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action research planner. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Zuber-Skerrit, O. (1995). Models for action research. In S. Pinchen & R. Passfield. (Eds.) Moving On: Creative applications of action learning and action research. (pp. 3 - 29). Queensland, Australia: Action Research, Action Learning and Process Management.
Chow, F. M., & Jaizah Mahamud. (2011). Action research: Concepts & Practices in Education (Kajian tindakan: Konsep & amalan dalam pendidikan). Puchong: Multimedia Publication.
Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research living theory. London, UK: Sage.
Nadarajan Thambu, & Ganesan Shanmugavelu. (2016). Development of Moral Thinking Values through Theatre Forum: A Research Action in Moral Class (Unsur ‘niat moral’ dalam teater forum: Satu kajian tindakan di kelas Pendidikan Moral). Asian Education Action Research Journal (AEARJ), 5, 1-14.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. New York: Pearson
Nadarajan Thambu, & Muhammad Hasbi Abdul Rahman. (2017). Forum Theatre as a behavior change strategy: Qualitative findings from Moral Education class.SEARCH: The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities, 9(1), 25-46.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research psychology, 3, 77-101.
David Wilkinson and Peter Birmingham. (2014). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. London : Taylor &Francis Group.
Bergman, R. (2002). Why be moral . A Conceptual Model from Developmental Psychology. Human Development, 45 (2), 104–124.
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48(4), 232–256.
Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.
Wilson, John. (1973). A teacher’s guide to moral education. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
Bratton, V. (2016). Affective morality. Unpublished Thesis ,The Florida State University College Of Business Affective.
Heinrichs, K., & Oser, F. (2013). Handbook of Moral Motivation. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Published
Abstract Display: 1722 
PDF Downloads: 3295 
This work is licensed under a